The policy backlash hits algorithms as EV losses mount

The tensions between policymakers and platforms intensify while consumer demand favors affordability.

Alex Prescott

Key Highlights

  • Ford reports a $5 billion EV loss as high-priced models miss demand.
  • Detroit automakers collectively lose about $50 billion in market value amid EV doubts.
  • A United Nations body approves a 40-member scientific panel on artificial intelligence despite U.S. opposition.

On r/technology today, the community isn’t just debating gadgets; it’s indicting the power structures that shape our feeds, our markets, and our daily reliability. Three battlegrounds emerged: who decides what we see, who sets the price of progress, and why “smart” keeps failing when it matters.

Regulators vs. Algorithms: The New Speech Police

When officials treat feeds like campaign turf, expect backlash. The forum lit up over the FTC’s pressure on curation via the push to make Apple News surface more conservative outlets, while Brussels took a design scalpel to dopamine loops with a bid to kill infinite scrolling. Meanwhile, platform “safety” slid toward surveillance creep with Discord’s age verification rollout linked to Peter Thiel’s orbit, and public rhetoric tried to rewrite legal bedrock in a celebrity trek to D.C. that mangles Section 230.

"The Party of small Government, ladies and gentlemen...." - u/hikeonpast (5440 points)

Against that backdrop, global governance tried to get ahead of the curve with a UN-approved AI panel the U.S. opposed, even as culture figures urged rage over robots through Zazie Beetz’s call to rally the troops against AI. The throughline is familiar: policymakers and platforms promise protection while quietly consolidating power—an old story with new UI.

"It's crazy that they're doing this section 230 thing at the same time companies are rolling out age verification. I'm truly scared we're gonna have Internet ID and an Internet firewall like China and North Korea." - u/dorkes_malorkes (1567 points)

EV Reality Check: Price, Policy, and Product

Auto executives learned the hard way that demand curves don’t bend for vanity trucks. The forum’s verdict was brutal after Ford’s CEO framed a $5 billion EV loss as “the customer has spoken”: the customer spoke years ago and asked for affordable cars, not $90,000 experiments.

"People wanted affordable passenger EVs so we made a $90,000 pickup truck and nobody's opening their wallets, what gives?" - u/x86_64_ (10740 points)

Wall Street’s spin—a $50 billion “EV bubble” bursting in Detroit—misses the policy whiplash and product-market mismatch that Redditors flagged. The rest of the world is still buying EVs; it’s the U.S. price ladder and incentives that look broken, not the technology itself.

When “Smart” Breaks: Updates and Lasers

If your OS bricks itself overnight, “AI everywhere” feels more like a threat than a promise. The community’s patience ran out as Windows 11’s KB5077181 update triggered critical boot loops, underscoring a simple truth: reliability is the first feature.

"Windows: the OS where you can leave your computer on at night to find it unusable in the morning!" - u/nihiltres (882 points)

And when the security theater gets literal, the fallout is absurd: a laser defense system meant for drones blasted party balloons, prompting airport shutdowns and eye-rolling on the subreddit. Tech that overpromises and underdelivers isn’t just inconvenient; it’s costly, chaotic, and increasingly hard to trust.

Journalistic duty means questioning all popular consensus. - Alex Prescott

Related Articles

Sources